Peace Activists Occupy General Dynamics Weapons Plant

Vermont activists entered General Dynamics and locked themselves together in the firm’s lobby to protest the company’s war profiteering.

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.

On May 1st, International Workers’ Day, ten peace activists in Burlington, Vermont entered General Dynamics and locked themselves together in the main lobby of the building in protest against the company’s weapons manufacturing and war profiteering. University of Vermont student Benjamin Dube, one of the dozens of other activists present at the event, leaned out a window of the lobby, and pointed to the GD building, explaining, “This is the gas tank of the war machine, and we are the sugar.”

The demonstrators entered the lobby at around 3 pm, and proceeded to lock their arms together with PVC piping, duct tape and other materials. According to a press release put out by the group, the activists were demanding that “General Dynamics stop giving campaign contributions to the politicians responsible for regulating it, stop making Gatling guns, missiles and other weapons of mass destruction and give back the $3.6 million dollars in Vermont tax breaks General Dynamics received in 2007.”

Continue Reading

Palfrey’s Friend On Suicide Note: ‘That’s Not Her Signature’

Condo manager disputes authenticity of suicide notes, clear contradiction between style of letters

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, May 7, 2008

The manager of an Orlando condo building where Deborah Jean Palfrey, also known as the D.C. Madam, owned a unit disputes the alleged suicide notes that were published in the media - after witnessing examples of her handwriting going back years Joe Strizack concludes, “That is not her signature.”

“She could sign her signature a hundred times and it would be identical,” Strizack told a local NBC news station. “That is not her signature.”

“Strizack looked over the suicide notes, but he questioned if the notes were actually written by Palfrey, and if they were, he thinks they may have been written under duress,” according to the report.

Strizack remains convinced that Palfrey’s demeanor immediately before she allegedly took her own life betrayed no sign that she was contemplating suicide.

“Monday morning a woman tells you that she’s afraid for her life, she told me several instances where people we following her, and Thursday she’s dead,” Strizack said. “What do you think? If someone would put a hit out for her and if someone wanted something done they could do it.”

Strizack provided us with copies of Palfrey’s handwriting from personal letters and bill payments Palfrey had sent to him (click here for images).

While the overall style is obviously similar to the alleged suicide notes, certain letters and numbers are clearly different.

A comparison between one of Palfrey’s notes to Strizack shows a difference, for example, in the number “2″ (which is curled in the suicide letter but not in the note) and in letters like “T.”

A clear contradiction between the two styles is evident with the letter “N” in the word “Need” - which is of a different structure in the suicide note and flamboyantly curls up in comparison with Palfrey’s note to Strizack where the letter is much more understated.

An independent analysis on behalf of a handwriting expert needs to be undertaken in order to ascertain whether the writing belongs to Palfrey, is an outright fraud, or shows evidence of having been written under severe duress whereby Palfrey was forced to write the notes at gunpoint, for example.

As we reported on Monday, the content of Palfrey’s alleged suicide notes contradicts both her public statements and the context of her situation following her upcoming prison sentence.

Joe Strizack appeared on The Alex Jones Show yesterday and revealed that Palfrey had told him that her client list went “from the White House on down.” Palfrey told Strizack her clients consisted of “a lot of influential people” from both political parties.

Listen to the full interview below via You Tube.

GTA IV Hints at Police State with Anti-Terror Cop

Thanks DangerMouse

You have to put in your date of birth to watch this video because of “adult content”. It’s worth it. :)

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/827005/grand-theft-auto-4/videos/gta4_lcpd_030708.html

“My name is Brain O’Toole. I wanted to fight the War on Terror, but I don’t read so good. Most careers were closed to me. That’s why I joined the LCPD. Now I’m on the front lines; helping tourists and fighting terrorists!”

“I rifle through people’s bags on the subway to protect freedom. I arrest protesters at political conventions for straying outside the free-speech zone. “

“Being a cop used to be about stopping crime. Now, thanks to politicians, it’s about fighting terrorists…one old lady at a time.”

“I’m protecting freedom, whatever the cost. I’m a hero, and I know it.”

FBI Behind 1993 WTC Bombing

Insane Provocateur Attacks WeAreCHANGE

Agent provocateur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Traditionally, an agent provocateur (plural: agents provocateurs, French for “inciting agent”) is a person employed by the police or other law enforcement body to act undercover and entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may refer to a person or group who provokes another to perform a wrong or rash action, the deliberate purpose being to incite wider conflict or harm.

An agent provocateur is often a police officer who encourages suspects to carry out a crime under conditions where evidence can be obtained; or who suggests the commission of a crime to another, in hopes he will go along with the suggestion, so he may be convicted of the crime. These are sometimes called sting operations.

One common use of Agents provocateurs is to investigate consensual or “victimless” crimes; since each participant in such crimes are willing participants, it is often difficult for the authorities to discover such crimes without the use of undercover agents.

Agents provocateurs are also used against political opponents. Here, it has been documented that provocateurs deliberately carry out or seek to incite counter-productive or ineffective acts, in order to foster public disdain for the group and provide a pretext for aggression against the group; and to worsen the punishments its members are liable for (see Red-baiting).

Historically, Agents provocateurs activities have been one operational tactic of labor spies who may also be hired to infiltrate, monitor, disrupt, or subvert union activities.

During WW2, the Germans were notorious for putting an Agent provocateur (a “brick”) into the cell of a suspected resistance member, Communist or such. The agent pretended that he isn’t associated with the occupiers in any way, thus encouraging the captive into divulging sensitive information (like a warning message for their superiors or contacts in the resistance cell) in order to obtain a lead.

Terrorists act as agents provocateurs when they seek to provoke government repression or an aggressive response, hoping thereby to reduce the credibility of the government, gain it enemies, alienate, divide, and demoralize its constituency, and increase support for themselves. In this sense, provocation may be combined with endorsement terrorism. In many cases terrorist provocation is an example of what is colloquially called “let’s you and him fight”.

Within the United States the COINTELPRO program of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had FBI agents posing as political radicals in order to disrupt the activities of radical political groups in the U.S., such as the Black Panthers, Ku Klux Klan, and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. The activities of agents provocateurs against dissidents in Imperial Russia was one of the grievances that led to the Russian Revolution of 1917. Yevno Azef is an example of agent provocateur.

New York Police officers have been accused of acting as agents provocateurs during protests against the Republican National Convention in New York City.[1]

The activities of agents provocateurs pose a number of ethical and legal issues. Within common law jurisdictions, the law of entrapment seeks to discern whether the provocateur’s target intended to commit the crime he participated in with the provocateur, or whether the suggestion to commit the crime began with the provocateur. It is also debatable whether the institutionalized deception that the use of agents provocateurs implies is in fact more harmful to the social order than the various consensual offenses typically investigated by provocateurs.

Homeland Security Wants to ‘Steer’ Hurricanes

I can remember talking about weather modification right after Katrina and people thought that I was full of shit. Then China openly admits using weather modification technology and now this, from a major scientific publication. It should also be noted that there are people who were involved with “Project Stormfury” who say that it was not a failure.

Thanks DCUBED

Don’t stop hurricanes, guide them

03 May 2008
From New Scientist Print Edition.

Would-be hurricane fighters hoping to stop a future Katrina before it makes landfall should aim to wound, not kill. The goal should be to re-route hurricanes and ease their fury, rather than try to stop them forming in the first place.

This is the latest advice from weather modification experts. The field has a colourful history. In the 1960s and early 1970s, scientists on “Project Stormfury” tried in vain to disrupt the inner structure of hurricanes by seeding them with silver iodide crystals. Various other far-fetched ideas to neutralise storms have been mooted since then, such as cooling the ocean surface.

More recently, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) asked a Stormfury veteran called Joe Golden - now at the University of Colorado at Boulder - to gather experts to evaluate prospects for taming hurricanes. Last week, the panel reported their findings at an American Meteorological Society meeting on weather modification in Westminster, Colorado.

The group says aiming to stop storms altogether needs careful consideration: “Hurricanes serve a useful purpose in the Earth’s energy budget and… rainfall from tropical cyclones is a vital component of the regional water supply.” Diverting storms and weakening them should be the aim.

They have requested $2.6 million from the DHS over three years to study how this might be achieved. Golden told New Scientist that the DHS is receptive to the idea. “I’m very upbeat, amazed and encouraged,” he says.

Hurricanes - awesomely destructive, and they may be getting worse. Keep up with the latest in our continually updated special report.

From issue 2654 of New Scientist magazine, 03 May 2008, page 7

US Navy Deploys Around Latin America

Thanks Route24

By Lamia Oualalou

It’s now official: The Pentagon is going to resuscitate its Fourth Fleet, with the mission of patrolling Latin American and Caribbean waters. Created during the Second World War to protect traffic in the South Atlantic, the structure was dissolved in 1950. “By reestablishing the Fourth Fleet, we acknowledge the immense importance of maritime security in this region,” declared Adm. Gary Roughead, head of the Pentagon’s naval operations.    Based in Mayport, Florida, the fleet will operate under the double orders of the American Navy and the Army’s Southern Command, responsible for Latin America and the Caribbean. Vice Adm. Joseph Kernan will command the fleet, which should include a nuclear aircraft carrier.

According to Alejandro Sanchez, an analyst at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs, a research center on Latin America based in Washington, “the reestablishment of the Fourth Fleet is more of a political than a military gesture, designed to confront the rise in power of left-leaning governments in the region.” The Pentagon does not trouble to camouflage its intentions: “the message is clear: whether local governments like it or not, the United States is back after the war in Iraq,” Sanchez explains.

“New Threats”

De facto,, Washington’s military influence in the region has diminished considerably since September 11, 2001, and the launch of the “war against terrorism.” Concentrated on the Middle Eastern arc of crisis, the Pentagon did not pay much attention to the political upsets in its own backyard. Leftist governments, now broadly in the majority in Latin America, reproach the United States with the support it gave the dictatorships that reigned over several decades and to the ultra-neo-liberal policies those dictatorships applied.

While Washington assures that its sole interest in the region is combating “new threats” (terrorism, drug trafficking and the Maras gangs of Central America), Latin American people often see it as the pursuit of “imperialist” interests dictated by energy needs. The tensions between Washington and the radical presidents of the sub-continent’s main oil and gas producers (Venezuela, Equator and Bolivia) accentuate that perception.

As a sign of defiance, almost all Latin American countries have refused to sign the American Serviceman Protection Act, a treaty that prevents legal pursuit of American soldiers for crimes committed abroad.

The plan to install a military base in Paraguay, close to Bolivian gas fields, was denounced by Brazil and Argentina. Ecuador has made it known that the American military base installed in Manta until 2009 will not be allowed to renew its mandate. Worse still, Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has relaunched the idea of a South American Defense Council, explicitly excluding all United States intervention.

Washington’s sidelining comes at a time when new sources of conflict are arising in the region, as, for example, the one that pits Colombia on one side and Ecuador and Venezuela on the other, or that between Bolivia and Chile over sea access. An arms race is underway in the region, where governments have taken advantage of the economic revival to reequip their armies, neglected since the 1970s.

American arms manufacturers are no longer alone in this market: some European countries, but especially China, Russia and Iran, are trying to get a footing in a region that also attracts them for its natural resource and energy potential.

Medvedev Sworn in as Russian President. Putin Jr.?

By Shaun Walker in Moscow and Reuters
Wednesday, 7 May 2008

The eight-year presidency of Vladimir Putin came to an end today as his successor Dmitry Medvedev was sworn into office in a solemn ceremony in the Kremlin’s throne room.

Medvedev, a 42-year-old former corporate lawyer and longtime Putin ally, stressed freedom and the rule of law in his first remarks after taking the oath of office and receiving a gold chain of double-headed eagles symbolising the presidency.

“I believe my most important aims will be to protect civil and economic freedoms,” he told the 2,000 guests at the inauguration, broadcast live on television.

“We must fight for a true respect of the law and overcome legal nihilism, which seriously hampers modern development.”

The new leader, who arrived at the Kremlin alone in an armoured black stretch Mercedes limousine flanked by 11 motorcycle outriders, inherits a booming economy fuelled by high oil prices - but also a sobering set of challenges.

They include rampant corruption, rising inflation, a falling population, sickly industry and agriculture and increasingly tense relations with former Soviet neighbours and the West.

Mr Putin is almost certain to be named as Prime Minister, and many analysts expect him to continue calling the shots.

Most analysts expect Mr Medvedev to continue, at least initially, the domestic and foreign policy course charted by Mr Putin. “There’s an expectation among investors that there will be more of the same,” said Roland Nash, head of research at Renaissance Capital in Moscow. “Anything that isn’t will be a surprise.”

Mr Medvedev has based his whole presidential campaign on continuing Mr Putin’s legacy and when first tipped for the job, in December, immediately said he would ask Mr Putin to become Prime Minister. This played well in Russia, where Mr Putin remains a popular leader because of increased economic prosperity during his rule and the perception that Russia has again become a major world power. In a survey last week, just 8 per cent of respondents felt there had been more negative than positive aspects to Mr Putin’s eight years in charge.

Continue Reading

Beating the Drums of a Broader Middle Eastern War

Israel, Syria, and Lebanon Prepare the “Home Fronts”

Alan Watt on the Alex Jones Show 5-5-08

From: http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/

Alan Watt on the Alex Jones Show
Infowars.com (Alex Jones’ Website)
(Originally Aired Live: May 5, 2008 on Genesis Communications Network)
LISTEN / DOWNLOAD Hour 1

LISTEN / DOWNLOAD Hour 2

LISTEN / DOWNLOAD Hour 3